<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 1939 ALCOHOLICS ANONYMOUS PUBLISHED</title>
	<atom:link href="http://stepstudy.org/1939-alcoholics-anonymous-published/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://stepstudy.org</link>
	<description>History and practice of the Twelve Steps</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 13 May 2012 22:25:25 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: kieron.c</title>
		<link>http://stepstudy.org/1939-alcoholics-anonymous-published/#comment-520</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[kieron.c]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Mar 2009 09:06:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stepstudy.wordpress.com/?page_id=24#comment-520</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[its interesting to see the change that came about It started with a &#039;reliance on god&#039; (as each person understands that concept) to &#039;reliance on meetings&#039; NA&#039;s Basic text cleary promotes the social or resocialisation view as descibed on this website an most AA meetings i&#039;ve ever been to here in england, its again a social style of recovery with the 12x12 being the book for guidance. In fact i have been to many meetings where there is no sign of a big book anywhere. In the last year, through living many years of discontent, i encountered some AA groups that i can only describe as old school style. They clearly promote the conversion style and use the big book and are strict in following trad 5. I have never met such a happy bunch. They neither condemn any othergroups are styles. I really enjoy this style of rcovery and a new sponser took me through the book and the steps in 4 months. I have more contentment and peace of mind than ive had in years. Some use the terms &#039;recovered&#039; rather than &#039;in recovery&#039; but i dont really worry about that with my own description. Great articles by the way, Thanks]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>its interesting to see the change that came about It started with a &#8216;reliance on god&#8217; (as each person understands that concept) to &#8216;reliance on meetings&#8217; NA&#8217;s Basic text cleary promotes the social or resocialisation view as descibed on this website an most AA meetings i&#8217;ve ever been to here in england, its again a social style of recovery with the 12&#215;12 being the book for guidance. In fact i have been to many meetings where there is no sign of a big book anywhere. In the last year, through living many years of discontent, i encountered some AA groups that i can only describe as old school style. They clearly promote the conversion style and use the big book and are strict in following trad 5. I have never met such a happy bunch. They neither condemn any othergroups are styles. I really enjoy this style of rcovery and a new sponser took me through the book and the steps in 4 months. I have more contentment and peace of mind than ive had in years. Some use the terms &#8216;recovered&#8217; rather than &#8216;in recovery&#8217; but i dont really worry about that with my own description. Great articles by the way, Thanks</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

